Effect of conductive agent on the electronic conductivity of mixed powder & electrode
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of ideal electrode microstructure
1. Test Method
1.1 Test equipment: PRCD3100 (IEST-Yuan Neng Technology) series powder resistance meter is used to measure and evaluate the conductive properties of powder materials; BER2500 (IEST-Yuan Neng Technology) series electrode resistance meter is used to evaluate the conductive properties of the electrode.
Figure 2. (a) PRCD series appearance and structural diagram ;
(b) BER series appearance and structure diagram
1.2 Sample preparation and testing
1.2.2 Prepare the slurry according to the parameters in Table 1, apply it manually with a 200μm scraper, and test the electrode resistance of the prepared electrode.
Table 1. Pole preparation slurry ratio
2. Test results
The powder resistance tests were conducted on SP, NCM, and mixed powders NCM+PVDF and NCM+SP+PVDF. From the test results in Table 2 and Figure 3, it can be seen that, whether under low pressure or high pressure, after adding the binder PVDF to the NCM active powder, the electronic conductivity is significantly deteriorated, while after adding SP with good conductivity, the electronic conductivity of the mixed powder is significantly improved. In the process of evaluating the electronic conductivity of the positive active powder of lithium-ion batteries, the electronic conduction is mostly the contact conduction between particles. After adding PVDF powder with poor electronic conductivity, the PVDF powder will reduce the contact ratio between the original active particles, resulting in a change in the overall conduction path, which in turn leads to a decrease in the overall electronic conductivity. The role of the conductive agent in the lithium-ion battery electrode is to provide a channel for electron transmission. The right amount of conductive agent content can obtain a relatively high discharge capacity and good cycle performance. Too high or too low a conductive agent content will affect the electrical performance. When the conductive agent content is too high, the relative content of the active material will be reduced, which will reduce the specific capacity of the battery. When the content is too low, there are fewer electronic conduction channels, which is not conducive to large current charging and discharging, and the utilization rate of the active material in the electrode is relatively low. From the test results of the powder resistance, the conductive agent SP has very superior electronic conductivity compared to the active powder NCM. After adding SP to the NCM+PVDF mixed powder, the electronic conductivity of the powder in the full pressure range has also been significantly improved. This is mainly because after adding the SP with good conductivity, the change in the electronic conduction path of the actual powder measurement process is more along the SP path with good conductivity. It also further clarifies the main role of the conductive agent in lithium-ion battery electrodes.
Table 2. Powder resistance test results comparison table
In order to further clarify the correlation between the electronic conductivity of materials, slurry was prepared according to the ratio in Table 1 for different powders, and manual coating was performed under the same conditions with a scraper. After the electrode was made, the electrode resistance test was performed. Table 3 & Figure 4 show the test results of the electrode resistance. The electronic conductivity of the electrode under different ratios is quite different. Compared with the mixed powder resistance results in Table 2 & Figure 3, the electrode level also shows that the conductivity is rapidly improved after adding the conductive agent SP. It is further clarified that the addition of conductive agents at both the premixed powder level and the electrode level can effectively improve the electronic conductive path. The optimization of the conductive agent ratio is also crucial in the actual electrode process development stage. The amount of conductive agent is closely related to the particle size of the conductive agent material, the specific surface area of the active material and other conditions. The larger the specific surface area of the active material, the larger the particle size of the conductive agent, and the more conductive agent is used. The optimal ratio should be determined by systematic experiments based on the percolation theory model of the conductive network.
Table 3. Comparison of electrode resistance test results
Figure 4. Comparison of the average values of electrode resistance test results under different formulations
3. Summary
This paper uses PRCD series powder resistance detection equipment and BER series electrode resistance detection equipment to conduct a systematic evaluation of resistance performance at two levels: mixed powder and electrode. It clarifies the role and influence of the conductive agent and the trend correlation between different levels. Based on this, the system formula can be further optimized, and the performance of the electrode level can be preliminarily estimated from the powder performance, providing a new idea for the research and development of lithium-ion battery technology.
Canrd Brief Introduce
Canrd use high battery R&D technology(core members are from CATL) and strong Chinese supply chain to help many foreign companies with fast R&D. We provide lab materials,electrodes, custom dry cells, material evaluation, perfomance and test, coin/pouch/cylindrical cell equipment line, and other R&D services.
Email:janice@canrd.com
Phone/Wechat/WhatsApp/Skype:+86 18928276992
Website : www.canrud.com
Comments
Post a Comment